Mad Cow Case Clouds Bush's Political Outlook
Report of Disease Colors Spurt of Good News With a Touch
of Uncertainty
By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 28, 2003;
CRAWFORD, Tex., Dec. 27 -- The discovery of mad cow
disease in the United States could shift the political
landscape at the start of President Bush's reelection
year by injecting uncertainty into a fragile economy
and drawing scrutiny to his handling of an industry
that was a financial and political ally in the last
election, analysts in both parties said yesterday.
White House officials had sounded ebullient as they
headed into the holidays at a time when economic indicators
were turning up, Saddam Hussein was in captivity and
a new Medicare law had just been signed. Now, the administration
will start 2004 under the type of sudden economic threat
that Bush aides had expected would come only from a
terrorist attack.
"Life is just not as good as December was for
the president," Republican pollster Whit Ayres
said.
Bush has closer ties to ranching than to any other
industry besides oil, and Democrats seized on this new
avenue for attacking Bush as a captive of business.
Howard Dean, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination,
said that it showed "the complete lack of foresight
by the Bush administration once again."
Dan Glickman, agriculture secretary under President
Bill Clinton and now director of Harvard University's
Institute of Politics, said the White House has just
weeks to develop a plan for more rigorous livestock
tracing and testing. He suggested that Bush bring together
representatives of science, consumers and the industry
in early January -- a time when his aides had hoped
to be focused on the State of the Union address.
"This will require very aggressive, proactive
solutions coming from the administration," Glickman
said. "You cannot monkey around with this. This
is a big potential problem."
Hysteria over mad cow disease in Britain in 1996 helped
bring down the Conservative government of Prime Minister
John Major, who was accused of hiding the truth and
failing to enforce regulations. Bush's aides sensed
the potential political peril of Wednesday's announcement
and said they had used the British experience as a case
study of what not to do. Aides distanced Bush from the
news and put Agriculture Department officials in front
of cameras to give information that they hoped would
reassure consumers, the industry, the markets and other
countries. Nevertheless, more than two dozen nations
have banned the import of U.S. beef.
Bush has been silent about the announcement that bovine
spongiform encephalopathy, the degenerative brain affliction
that is known as mad cow disease and is fatal in its
human version, had been discovered in a Holstein raised
in Washington state. The only time Bush has been seen
publicly in the past five days was when he traveled
Friday from Camp David to his 1,600-acre ranch here
for New Year's week. His only public words were a prerecorded
radio address broadcast Saturday calling for prayers
for the armed forces.
Aides said they concluded they had a better chance
of bolstering public confidence if they made it clear
that the crisis was being handled by experts, rather
than allowing Bush to appear to be grandstanding.
David Winston, a pollster who advises House and Senate
Republicans, said he sees a "9/11 dynamic"
in which the public will not blame Bush for the event
but will judge him on his response to it.
Administration officials said their strategy is to
try to calm the public and overseas governments by providing
information as quickly as possible, and to try to maintain
credibility by announcing information before it leaked
to the markets or reporters.
Alisa Harrison, press secretary of the Department of
Agriculture, said officials have continually updated
a mad cow response plan that includes an incident command
team to coordinate the investigation. The plan's communications
section drew on Federal Aviation Administration techniques
for handling the phone calls that flood in after a plane
crash.
Harrison said USDA's two guiding principles are: "Keep
the public informed of any new developments as soon
as we know them to be true. Use science to guide our
decision-making regarding the risk to public health."
Seeking to protect exports, the USDA used webcasts
of its briefings to reach overseas reporters, and the
administration launched a diplomatic offensive that
included calls by Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman
to leaders of Canada, Japan, Mexico and the Philippines.
Two senior USDA officials flew from Washington to Tokyo
on Saturday and plan to visit Seoul and perhaps other
beef customers before returning.
Bush donned a cowboy hat when he spoke last year to
the annual convention of the National Cattlemen's Beef
Association, and livestock interests have been among
his most reliable supporters. The Center for Responsive
Politics found that 79 percent of the livestock industry's
$4.7 million in contributions for the 2000 elections
went to Republicans. Of the $1.1 million the industry
has given so far for next year's election, 84 percent
went to the GOP.
Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), who has been seeking
a Meat Traceability and Safety Act, called the current
standards "another example of the White House doing
what industry wants, rather than what the consumer needs."
Dean, in an interview Friday with the Associated Press,
said that the mad cow discovery "is something that
easily could be predicted and was predicted" and
that the administration could have softened the blow
by setting up a system that provided "instant traceability."
He called for "instant traceability" of meat
and a federal economic aid package for the industry.
|